Contributory Economy

Laboratories to know what it looks and feels like to co‑design a more democratic, equitable and sustainable caring future

CESS-P creates participatory laboratories — grounded in recognition theory, social ontology, and critical praxis — where diverse participants experience and co-produce alternative futures with AI assistance.

01

Contributory Economy

Moving beyond redistributive and purely market-based models toward economies where the social value of individual and collective contributions is recognised — where esteem, dignity and material equity are structurally interlinked.

02

Social Sculpting

Drawing on the tradition that every person shapes society through creative action. Our laboratories use participatory methods to make visible the recognitive expectations — of care, authority, and contribution — immanent in collaborative social life.

03

AI-Assisted Futures

Investigating how artificial intelligence can serve as a material mediation for collective imagination — surfacing hidden assumptions, modelling systemic interactions, and reintroducing the instrumental and embodied dimensions that critical theory has too often left aside.

What does it look and feel like when the concerns, authority, and contributions of all participants in social life are appropriately and mutually recognised?

Join the laboratory

Interested in participating or collaborating?

About CESS-P

Recognition, praxis, and the material conditions of democratic co-design.

What We Do

CESS-P — Contributory Economy Social Sculpting Productions — creates laboratories where diverse participants come together to explore, prototype, and experience alternative futures. These are not simulations at a distance. They are immersive, participatory environments designed to make the abstract tangible: what does a more democratic economy actually feel like when the concerns, authority, and contributions of all participants are appropriately recognised?

Our work draws on the Frankfurt School tradition of critical social theory, and specifically on recognition-theoretical approaches to social ontology. We take seriously the insight that experiences of injustice — not abstract moral principles — are the motivational basis for political action, and that social life is constituted by collaborative activities with recognitive expectations built into them.

Theoretical Foundations

CESS-P's approach is informed by a relational, rather than substantialist, conception of forms of life. Rather than treating social arrangements as monolithic problem-solving entities, we focus on the internal differentiations, constitutive processes, and relations between individuals and groups engaged in collaborative activity. Three dimensions of recognitive status are central to our laboratory design: whose concerns count in setting collective goals; who has authority or a say on the norms governing collaboration; and whose contributions are recognised and appreciated.

We also take seriously the critique that critical theory has lost the dimension of nature and materiality. Following the argument that the intersubjectivistic turn should not lead to the loss of the object, our laboratories restore attention to embodiment, intercorporeity, and the material mediations — including tools, environments, and technologies — through which recognition is enacted or denied.

AI as Material Mediation

Artificial intelligence enters our framework not as a replacement for human judgement but as a contemporary form of material mediation in collaborative social life. AI can surface hidden assumptions in how problems are framed, model complex systemic interactions across the three dimensions of recognition, and enable participants to explore a wider range of possibilities than dialogue alone permits.

This responds to a specific theoretical gap: the absence, in much critical social theory, of serious engagement with the instrumental and objective dimensions of praxis. Every AI component in our laboratories is designed to amplify human agency, not diminish it — to serve participatory and democratic goals rather than centralised control.

The Contributory Economy

The "contributory" in CESS-P signals a particular orientation within the third sphere of recognition: the sphere in which individuals are recognised for their specific contributions to social cooperation. We investigate economic arrangements in which the social value of diverse forms of contribution — care work, creative labour, community maintenance, ecological stewardship — is made visible and structurally supported, rather than subordinated to market metrics alone.

Who We Work With

CESS-P collaborates with universities, local authorities, community organisations, cultural institutions, and international research networks. We welcome partnerships with anyone committed to democratic, equitable, and sustainable futures — and who takes seriously the idea that to build a better future, people need to experience fragments of it.

Knowledges

Blogs, articles, and resources informing the CESS-P programme.

Blogs

CESS-P blog posts exploring ideas at the heart of the programme.

PDF

AI & Class Consciousness Chatbots

Exploring how artificial intelligence and chatbot technologies intersect with questions of class, consciousness, and collective social understanding.

PDF · View & Download
PDF

Adam & Eve: Socionomy Education Genesis

An exploration of foundational narratives and socionomy — the study of social groups — in the context of education and origin stories.

PDF · View & Download
PDF

Agathon at Plato's Symposium

A reading of Agathon's speech at the Symposium through the lens of recognition theory and the aesthetics of social co-creation.

PDF · View & Download
PDF

Sociometry & Flocking Starlings

Drawing on the emergent collective behaviour of starling murmurations as a model for thinking about sociometric patterns in human groups.

PDF · View & Download

Articles

Key academic publications underpinning the CESS-P theoretical framework.

PDF

Politicizing Honneth's Ethics of Recognition

Deranty & Renault (2007). Argues that the ethics of recognition must clarify its political dimensions to remain conceptually sustainable. Thesis Eleven, 88.

PDF · View & Download
PDF

Desubstantializing the Critique of Forms of Life

Ikäheimo, Deranty & Goris (2023). Proposes a relational alternative to Jaeggi's substantialist ontology, grounded in recognitive expectations. Inquiry.

PDF · View & Download
PDF

The Loss of Nature in Axel Honneth's Social Philosophy

Deranty (2005). Rereading Mead with Merleau-Ponty: restoring embodiment, materiality and intercorporeity to the recognition paradigm. Critical Horizons, 6:1.

PDF · View & Download

Theory

Foundational theoretical texts shaping the CESS-P intellectual framework.

PDF

Whither Work?

Breen & Deranty (2021). Examines the changing nature and normative significance of work, asking what forms of labour and contribution deserve recognition in contemporary social life.

PDF · View & Download

Get in Touch

Whether you're a researcher, practitioner, policymaker, or community organiser — we'd welcome a conversation about how we might work together.

Location Melbourne Australia
Web www.cess-p.com
Social LinkedIn · Twitter/X

Industry Partners

Organisations and cultural institutions collaborating with and supporting the CESS-P programme.

FP
FOPA
fopa.info

FOPA is a key industry partner of CESS-P, collaborating on the development of participatory laboratories and social sculpting methodology.

SG
Seventh Gallery
seventhgallery.org

A Melbourne-based contemporary artist-run initiative providing a cultural space for experimental and socially engaged artistic practice — a key collaborator in the CESS-P programme.